With the TRIPS Agreement shall enter into force in 1995, BRIC countries made important reforms in the systems of intellectual property. A relatively new analytical definition of the industrial components of the economy is "Creative Industries", in which a command creativity and intellectual property will be the outcome. Worldwide, the mapping have agreed to the creative industry are indeed "economically significant" and justified compared with other high-rankingSectors with respect to their contribution to income, employment and trade.
Concept of intellectual property rights in the BRIC —
Brazil adopted its first intellectual property in 1887. Brazil meets International Standards of Intellectual Property Protection. Brazil is a signatory to several conventions, treaties and agreements that define the basic research that is internationally recognized standards of intellectual property protection, including, inter alia, the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Brazil is also a Member ofTrade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). The new intellectual property rights came into force in May 1996. This law brought in Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office, made up to the eye level with the international standards established by the TRIPS Agreement. Protection of intellectual property in Brazil covers copyright, software rights, and also some secondary laws.
In Russia, the concept of intellectual property rights understood as patents, especially in the times of the former Soviet Union. The owner of the patents as well asas all innovations was always the state. The concept of intellectual property has already changed dramatically in Russia, and now is in the IPR seeing consisting of patents, trademarks, utility modes, design, domain names and copyrights. After 10 years of independence of Russia, the country has begun to come into line with international regulations for the protection of intellectual property. Even today, much work needed to be done to bring Russia up to international standard.
Indian IntellectualProperty Laws to keep pace with technological developments and laws concerning intellectual property of other countries. India has signed various positions in relation to intellectual property right in front of the member of the TRIPS Agreement and in accordance with the TRIPS Agreement. Patent, copyright, trademark and design have existed only as a branch of intellectual property rights in the TRIPS Agreement. However, at present Patents (Amendment) Act 2005, Trade Marks Act 1999, Copyright Act 1999, Design Act 2000, trade secrets, layout designIntegrated circuits 2000, current 1999 figures and 2001 Plant Variety Protection of intellectual property rights relate are to be enforced in India. India acceded to the TRIPS Agreement signed in 1995, the Paris Convention in 1998, Budapest Treaty in 2001, Universal Convention on Copyright (UCC) in 1952, Washington Convention for Integrated Circuit in 1989, and agreements in the field of bio-diversity (CBD) in 1994. India is signatory to the Berne Convention and Indian government has already approved the Madrid Protocol.
China has had a history25 years in the filed of protection of intellectual property. China's current legal IPR framework began in the 1980s, but in that short time, China has made impressive progress in the protection and enforcement of intellectual property. China became a member of WIPO in June 1980. The Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (PRC) was adopted 1984th In 1993, the Law of the People's Republic of China Against Unfair Competition was adopted and the copyright was enforced in 1990.
Enforcement of intellectual property rights
TheThe origin and history of intellectual property in BRIC countries as the top shows the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights in the BRIC countries has also long been reintroduced, and the journey is clearly not being won.
Despite the come with different stories, the BRIC countries will receive the same treatment, some of the richest nations. Copyright and piracy are always selected as a topic for the examination of the intellectual future of the BRICRegime. However, other areas have the protection of intellectual property more extensive role for most industries and play a crucial role in the economic development of the industry and the nation. In particular, the impact of patents on innovation and economic performance is so complex that it is a well-organized patent system is crucial to ensure maximum benefit for the company of a country and its economy as a whole.
Despite the different histories, the BRIC countries in general on the same page todayif it provides for the protection of pharmaceuticals. The revised law in Brazil is now in line with TRIPS, at least regarding the subject of protection. Brazil introduced a formal system for approval of generics. After Russia launched the modern industrial property rights with individual ownership, Russia is currently protects pharmaceutical patents. The previous Indian Patents Act (1970) recognized pharmaceutical patents on "processes", but not on 'products', so that domesticPharmaceutical companies to produce cheap copies of patented pharmaceutical products manufactured by foreign companies using alternative production methods. In India, introduction of product patents in 2005, announced innovation and the rapid development of this country's pharmaceutical industry and the supply of new drugs. The Mashelkar Committee has been revised report was submitted in March 2009, are being made every effort to provide medicines at affordable prices to people in India. The report also notedthat it is not TRIPS-compliant limit granting of patents for pharmaceutical substance to NCE (New Chemical Entities) only, and excludes an entire class of inventions, ie incremental pharmaceutical inventions. After the conclusion of this report, incremental innovation, "the new forms, analogues, etc with significantly better safety and efficacy standards to be promoted.
Chinese social environment for the protection of intellectual property is complex.The locally produced generics and copy products dominate the Chinese drug market. It is estimated that about 97 percent of the medicines produced by local companies in China are generics or counterfeits.
The component in all BRIC compulsory licensing statute is the provision for government use in times of national emergency. Commercial processing of patent is mandatory in India, Brazil and Russia. The failure of a patented items locally may lead to the introduction of productiona license. Under Indian patent law does not amount to the co-import of the patent. Perhaps the most important compulsory license for use by BRIC countries will not come from the requirement of domestic market, but by exporting medicines to developing or least developed countries that have taken place, licenses. As explained above, India, China and Brazil each major pharmaceutical and manufacturing sectors have been achieved in the production of generic drugs, and all of themare members of the trip. Natco had filed applications for compulsory licenses for export of generic anti-cancer drug sunitinib and erlotinib, both in India to Nepal patented under Section 92A of the Indian patent law. However, Natco controller of patents subsequently requested to withdraw their applications for compulsory licensing.
Despite the similarities in the provisions on compulsory licensing, there is a significant divergence in how this flexibility has been in the past usedBRIC countries. The differences serve as an outline of the relative development of intellectual property and may provide a metric for future analysis. More importantly, it is possible that one way, the paradigm for the other BRIC countries want a balance between rights and access is available.
Economic importance of IPR in BRIC countries
With the BRIC countries, the strengthening of IPR systems in the last decade, they have growth in the real flows of imports and increases in the real stock of experiencedFDI (Foreign Direct Investment). The authorities in the BRIC countries are stronger IPR policies shown because of the realization that an infringement action cost involved in terms of foregone tax revenues and job creation, with a negative impact on the actual technology transfer and domestic innovation.
Between 2000 and 2005 made the BRIC countries contribute 28 percent of global growth in dollars and 55 percent in purchasing power parities. The intra-BRICs tradealso reported that up to 8 percent from 5 percent in 2000 to accelerate. In the BRIC countries was technology transfer through trade and foreign direct investment is an important factor in the development of technological capabilities. There are many signs of the development of trade relations, including the strong surge in Brazil has been trading with China, Chinese investment commitments in Brazil and the exponential growth in trade between China and India.
IPR is not determined solely technological success or even increasedAccess to technology, other free factors that affect the specific innovation and the dissemination of technologies such as the quality of knowledge institutions, financial system, availability of trained human resources and networks for cooperation in research, or the interaction of the important factors, the BRIC countries have to facilitate for the great technological success.
Software Patents: A unique area of patenting
There is intense debate about the extent to which software patents should be granted.Various countries and regional offices have different standards for the granting of software patents. Section 3 (k) of the Indian Patents Act prohibits the granting of the patent, an invention, the software per se is addressed. Indian Patent Office has now Indian Patent Design Manual 2008th According to Section 4.11.6 of the draft Indian Patent Manual 2008 should clearly define the method of claim you the steps involved in carrying out the invention. It should have a technical character. In other words, itwas a technical problem to solve. The claim is oriented toward a "process / method" should be a hardware or machine limitation. Technical applicability of the software claimed as a process or method claim, is required to be defined in relation to the respective hardware. Brazil provides special protection for the software and software by copyright laws, which take effect on 19 June 1998 and February 1998 had represented. A U.S. federal court ruling on the admissibility of business methodsPatents that have a direct impact on the ongoing debate on amendments to the Indian Patents Guide. It was investigated that patents on business methods are seven times more likely to be processed, compared to other patents.
In Brazil, infringement of copyright in the software can lead to criminal penalties. Under the Berne Convention, computer software was treated as a kind of literary work under copyright law in China. Software is still excluded from patentability inRussia.
Conclusion
BRIC countries have all found their own way in preserving at least some legal sovereignty in the arena of intellectual property. Although the BRIC countries have grown more than expected, but all is not satisfactory, as far as the economies of the BRIC countries are affected. Current success is of course no guarantee of future results. Further progress is needed if they continue to deliver the best possible results over a longer period.
0